logo

Asylum Seekers Finding Long Lines at San Diego Ports of Entry

image
Author: Jeff Powers
Created: 28 December, 2017
Updated: 21 November, 2022
2 min read

U.S. Customs and Border Protection said they have reached capacity at Otay Mesa and San Ysidro and are telling Asylum seekers to not approach the border.

Officials say there are so many people fleeing persecution in their home countries that federal officials can't process all of them. Those seeking asylum are being help in temporary holding cells while border officials work through the backlog.

An official with U.S. Customs and Border Protection said that "no one is being turned away from ports of entry; however, there is a backup for those awaiting processing."

THIS HAS HAPPENED BEFORE

In October 2016, more than 6,000 people asked to come in despite not having documents permitting entry to the U.S. In November 2017, the number of people deemed inadmissible was 2,824, more than double the low of 1,313 reached in March of this year.

In early May this year, about 110 asylum seekers came to the U.S. as part of an organized caravan that journeyed across Mexico to advocate for the right of those persecuted in their home countries.

After the month-long trip, the group reached Tijuana in early May and split into groups to come to the U.S. border. Those from the caravan came from Cameroon, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guinea, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua and Sierra Leone. Forty-eight of them are children.

They were detained by ICE.

Asylum seekers are detained until a determination is made if they can prove they have been wrongly persecuted. If they don’t pass the interviews, they get sent back to their home countries. If they pass, they must stay in detention for the remainder of their cases.

More Choice for San Diego

According to government code § 1208.13 Establishing Asylum Eligibility, Asylum seekers must prove that they’ve been persecuted because of their race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group.

ARTICLE 33

Criticisms for the way the CBP is handling the asylum seekers are based largely on the Refugee Convention of 1951.

In a story on KPBS, Deborah Anker, a professor at Harvard Law School's Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program, said the move is a violation of the convention and Article 33.

She said, "There's no question that this violates the statute, it violates our treaty obligations," she said. "You can't turn people away at the border. That's very fundamental ... It's not a gray area."

Border officials say they aren't turning away asylum seekers, and that this is a processing delay.

Latest articles

Vote
Leaders of Pro-Voter Movement for Better Elections to Meet in San Diego
The work to make elections better for voters never stops and no one knows that better than the organizations that put a historic number of systemic reforms on the 2024 ballot. And now, these leaders will gather in San Diego to plan for the future of this massive movement....
13 November, 2024
-
3 min read
money in politics
Maine Voters Reject Big Money in Politics Amidst Most Expensive Election Ever
The 2024 elections broke another spending record from independent political groups. Yet, amidst billions being used to influence voter decisions, Maine citizens voted to rein in this spending on Election Day....
12 November, 2024
-
5 min read
Arizona Government
Arizona Rejected Primary Reform in 2024, But Voters Don't Support the Status Quo Either
Election Day was mostly a rough night for election reformers across the board, from primary reform to new voting methods to gerrymandering. However, it would be a mistake to suggest that this means voters are okay with the status quo....
12 November, 2024
-
4 min read