logo

Oklahoma City Mayor David Holt: 'Open Primaries Aren't a Weird, Foreign Concept'

vote
Photo by Phil Scoggs on Unsplash.
Created: 01 October, 2024
2 min read

Photo by Phil Scroggs on Unsplash

 

In a new video posted by the nonpartisan primary reform group Open Primaries, Oklahoma City Mayor David Holt discusses his support for an open primary system in which all candidates have to make their case to all registered voters, regardless of party.

"Open primaries aren't a weird, foreign concept," he said. 

Holt contrasted the incentive structure of a nonpartisan primary system used in many cities across the country and in states like Alaska and California to a partisan primary system, like the closed system in Oklahoma. 

"People always look at Oklahoma City and Tulsa and they say, 'For whatever successes or failures you have, gosh it sure seems like you are electing mayors that unify people, that seem competent, that are well liked across the political spectrum,' and it's not magic," says Holt.

He adds that perceptions of elected leaders in Oklahoma's two largest cities versus those of state and federal leadership directly trace back to how voters elect people.

Holt further explained:

More Choice for San Diego

"In Oklahoma City and Tulsa, we have basically a nonpartisan top two -- you can call it a jungle primary, you can call it any number of things, you can call it a unified primary -- but the reality is it has two principles that I think are critical."

The first principle is "every voter gets to see all the candidates," regardless of party affiliation or lack thereof. The second principle is "all of the candidates have to face all the voters."

Notably, the term "jungle primary" is often associated with nonpartisan primary systems in general, but it was first used to describe the nonpartisan election system in Louisiana -- which is a different system altogether.

In Louisiana, there is only a general election and while all candidates and voters participate, if a candidate gets over 50% of the vote that candidate wins the election. If not, a runoff election is held the following month.

This is different than the nonpartisan primaries used in Alaska, California, and Washington, in which the top two or top four (in Alaska) candidates advance to the general election regardless of how much of the vote they get. 

Holt added that candidates who have run in a closed partisan primary understand that to be successful in elections candidates have to appeal to "a narrower, narrower slice of the electorate."

The incentive is to govern to that shrinking group of voters.

Holt believes that most voters want to see candidates work together. He said there is an extreme minority on both sides who may make up 15% of the electorate, but 70% of voters want elected officials to get things done. 

More Choice for San Diego

"What we have seen as a formula for success in Oklahoma City absolutely can be replicated at the state level," he said. Check out more from the conversation in the video above. 

In this article

Latest articles

two parties
The Parties Strike Back: Deceptive Tactics Lead to Rough Night for More Choice Elections
Voters across the US had a chance to change the political landscape in the country forever. In 2024, however, the two major parties were mostly successful at stopping reform to the electoral status quo....
06 November, 2024
-
5 min read
Lincoln Memorial
DC Voters Open Primaries to Over 73,000 Independents, Pass Ranked Choice Voting
The first victory for election reform Tuesday happened in Washington, DC, where voters passed Initiative 83 to open primaries to independent voters and implement ranked choice voting....
05 November, 2024
-
3 min read
Colorado Flag
Initiative to Give Colorado Voters More Choice Falls Short of Victory
Colorado is used to being a trailblazer in election reform, from vote-by-mail to independent redistricting. However, state voters passed on an opportunity to give voters more choice in taxpayer-funded elections in 2024. ...
05 November, 2024
-
4 min read