Who Wins a Trade War? Not Independent Voters

A trade port with ships and cranes.
Photo by Kurt Cotoaga on Unsplash
Created: 24 Mar, 2025
3 min read

Editor's Note: This piece originally appeared on The Independent Center's website and has been republished on IVN with permission from the organization.

 

Trade wars, often fueled by protectionist policies and tariffs, have historically led to economic and geopolitical instability. The notion that trade wars are easy to win is not only misleading but dangerous. Protective tariffs result in increased consumer prices, weaken domestic manufacturing competitiveness, and provoke retaliatory actions from trade partners. These effects collectively harm both national and global economies. Furthermore, history has demonstrated that trade disputes can escalate beyond economics, fostering diplomatic tensions and even contribute to armed conflicts.

Key points:

  • Foreign nations retaliate with their own tariffs.
  • Trade wars can evolve into diplomatic crises or military conflicts.

Zooming In

Historical Lessons from the 20th Century:

  • The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 worsened global economic conditions.
  • Protectionist policies in the early 20th century exacerbated international tensions leading up to World War II.
  • Post-war leaders recognized the dangers of trade barriers and laid the groundwork for global trade institutions like the World Trade Organization (WTO).

The Economic Downside of Tariffs:

  • Tariffs increase costs for domestic manufacturers reliant on foreign raw materials.
  • They strengthen the domestic currency, making exports more expensive and less competitive.
  • Inflationary expectations drive up consumer prices as businesses anticipate higher costs.

Free Trade's Benefits and Challenges:

  • Free trade generates widespread economic benefits but also creates localized economic disruptions.
  • The rise of global supply chains has made trade restrictions even riskier in modern times.

Why It Matters

Trade policy affects everyday lives, influencing the price of goods, job availability, and economic growth. Understanding the ramifications of tariffs and trade wars is crucial for voters and policymakers alike.

  • The interconnected nature of today’s economy means that a trade war impacts not just one country but the entire global market.
  • History has repeatedly shown that protectionism can lead to greater instability rather than prosperity.
  • Current economic structures, such as retirement investments tied to the stock market, mean that protectionist policies can directly impact citizens’ financial security.

Moreover, trade disputes can damage diplomatic relations. As seen in the past, economic conflicts have led to resentment and political instability, contributing to broader international conflicts. Ensuring a balanced trade policy helps maintain global stability and economic growth.

Independent Lens

When it comes to trade policy, independent voters want pragmatic, fact-based policy rather than ideological extremes. Independent voters propelled the GOP to power in November because they were viewed as more sound on the key issues of affordability and inflation.

By focusing on long-term economic stability and sound leadership, rather than short-term political victory, an independent approach seeks sustainable solutions that benefit both businesses and workers. Avoiding reactionary trade policies and instead fostering collaboration on fair trade practices will help prevent the historical pitfalls of past trade wars.

History and economic analysis show that trade wars are not easily won and often inflict more harm than benefit. Often, raising tariffs is like shooting your own foot. Smart, independent policy-making can help avoid the worst consequences while ensuring that global trade remains a force for prosperity rather than conflict.  

IVP Donate

Latest articles

Hand sticking ballot in ballot box.
Same Election: Voter ID Wins Big; GOP Loses Big
Many have seen the story out of Wisconsin: Susan Crawford defied record-breaking spending by Super PACs to win the April 1 state Supreme Court election. “Crawford beat Musk,” is the headline after the world’s richest man poured millions into the race to defeat her, while liberal billionaires also opened up their own pocketbooks for Crawford....
03 Apr, 2025
-
3 min read
Image of a gavel and legal professionals at a desk.
A Recent Court Decision Could Reshape the Legal Battle over Closed Primaries
Litigation is often seen as a zero-sum game of wins and losses. In that lens, a recent 11th Circuit decision that upholds Florida’s closed primary system has been declared another win for political parties and closed primaries. But it’s the wrong framing....
03 Apr, 2025
-
4 min read
Clear ballot box with ballot inside.
Skokie Is the Latest Illinois City to Embrace Ranked Choice Voting
Skokie voters went to the polls on April 1 amidst a closely watched mayoral election to decide whether or not to adopt ranked choice voting (RCV). With 100% of precincts reporting, 58% of participating voters said ‘Yes’ to changing how the city conducts elections. ...
02 Apr, 2025
-
2 min read